Citation Tools
PDFEditorials
Male circumcision and the enhancement debate: harm reduction, not prohibition
Download to a citation manager
Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:
- Cite this article as:
- Male circumcision and the enhancement debate: harm reduction, not prohibition
Other content recommended for you
- The child's interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision
- Infant circumcision: the last stand for the dead dogma of parental (sovereignal) rights
- Rationalising circumcision: from tradition to fashion, from public health to individual freedom—critical notes on cultural persistence of the practice of genital mutilation
- Out of step: fatal flaws in the latest AAP policy report on neonatal circumcision
- Forced circumcision of men (abridged)
- Veracity and rhetoric in paediatric medicine: a critique of Svoboda and Van Howe's response to the AAP policy on infant male circumcision
- Male or female genital cutting: why ‘health benefits’ are morally irrelevant
- Traditional male circumcision and the risk for HIV transmission among men: a systematic review
- A covenant with the status quo? Male circumcision and the new BMA guidance to doctors
- Male partner circumcision associated with lower Trichomonas vaginalis incidence among pregnant and postpartum Kenyan women: a prospective cohort study