Article Text
Abstract
One of the most pressing ethical challenges facing phase I cancer research centres is the process of informed consent. Historically, most scholarship has been devoted to redressing therapeutic misconception, that is, the conflation of the nature and goals of research with those of therapy. While therapeutic misconception continues to be a major ethical concern, recent scholarship has begun to recognise that the informed consent process is more complex than merely a transfer of information and therefore cannot be evaluated only according to how well an individual understands such information. Other components of decision-making operate independently of understanding and yet still may compromise the quality of informed consent. Notable among these components is unrealistic optimism, an event-specific belief that one has a better chance of receiving benefit than others similarly situated. In this article, we consider responses to interviews with parents who had recently completed an informed consent conference for enrolling their child in a phase I cancer clinical trial to examine how this influence manifests and how investigators might address it during informed consent.
- Research Ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Two concepts of therapeutic optimism
- Perceptions of control and unrealistic optimism in early - phase cancer trials
- Understanding people ’s ‘ unrealistic optimism ’ about clinical research participation
- Phase 1 oncology trials and informed consent
- Informed consent for early - phase clinical trials: therapeutic misestimation, unrealistic optimism and appreciation
- Smokers ’ unrealistic optimism about their risk
- Faith, Hope And (No) Clarity
- Can phase I cancer research studies in children be justified on ethical grounds
- Psychological contribution to the understanding of adverse events in health care
- Phase I cancer trials: a qualitative study of specialist palliative care