Article info
PDFElectronic pages: Responses
After-birth abortion: the intuition argument
- Correspondence to Zohar Lederman, Visiting Scholar, Yale Interdisciplinary Center for Bioethics, New Haven, CT, USA; zoharlederman{at}gmail.com
Citation
After-birth abortion: the intuition argument
Publication history
- Received March 22, 2012
- Accepted January 31, 2013
- First published May 1, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?
- Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva
- Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Abortion, infanticide and moral context
- Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and ‘after-birth abortion’
- Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
- Philosophy, critical thinking and ‘after-birth abortion: why should the baby live?’
- Potentials and burdens: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva
- Infanticide: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva