Article info
PDFResponse
Paper
Abortion, infanticide and moral context
- Correspondence to Lindsey Porter, Philosophy Department, University of Sheffield, 45 Victoria Street, Sheffield S3 7QB, UK; l.porter{at}sheffield.ac.uk
Citation
Abortion, infanticide and moral context
Publication history
- Received March 12, 2012
- Accepted January 29, 2013
- First published May 1, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and ‘after-birth abortion’
- Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Of course the baby should live: against ‘after-birth abortion’
- After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?
- Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
- Infanticide: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva
- Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva
- The moral significance of being born
- Gestaticide: killing the subject of the artificial womb