Article info
PDFResponse
The moral status of babies
- Correspondence to Dr Andrew McGee, Faculty of Law, Health Law Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology, C Block, 2 George Street, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia; a.mcgee{at}qut.edu.au
Citation
The moral status of babies
Publication history
- Received March 5, 2012
- Revised January 10, 2013
- Accepted January 29, 2013
- First published May 1, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
- Abortion, infanticide and moral context
- Of course the baby should live: against ‘after-birth abortion’
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva
- After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?
- Infanticide: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva
- Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva
- The Italian reaction to the Giubilini and Minerva paper
- Potentials and burdens: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva