In their controversial paper ‘After-birth abortion’, Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva argue that there is no rational basis for allowing abortion but prohibiting infanticide (‘after-birth abortion’). We ought in all consistency either to allow both or prohibit both. This paper rejects their claim, arguing that much-neglected considerations in philosophical discussions of this issue are capable of explaining why we currently permit abortion in some circumstances, while prohibiting infanticide.
- Newborns and Minors
- Embryos and Fetuses
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
- Abortion, infanticide and moral context
- Of course the baby should live: against ‘after-birth abortion’
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva
- After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?
- Infanticide: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva
- Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva
- The Italian reaction to the Giubilini and Minerva paper
- Potentials and burdens: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva