Infanticide: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva
Share this article
Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.
Email this article to a friend
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and ‘after-birth abortion’
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Abortion, infanticide and moral context
- Why should the baby live? Human right to life and the precautionary principle
- After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?
- Will international human rights subsume medical ethics? Intersections in the UNESCO Universal Bioethics Declaration
- A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
- Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva
- After-birth and before-birth personhood: why the baby should live
- Mr Marty’s muddle: a superficial and selective case for euthanasia in Europe