Article info
Response
Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva
- Correspondence to Dr Bertha Alvarez Manninen, School of Humanities, Arts, and Cultural Studies, Arizona State University, 4701 W Thunderbird Road, Phoenix, AZ 85306, USA; bertha.manninen{at}asu.edu
Citation
Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva
Publication history
- Received March 9, 2012
- Revised November 29, 2012
- Accepted January 29, 2013
- First published May 1, 2013.
Online issue publication
May 01, 2013
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and ‘after-birth abortion’
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
- Of course the baby should live: against ‘after-birth abortion’
- Abortion, infanticide and moral context
- Birth, meaningful viability and abortion
- Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva
- The pearl of the ‘Pro-Life’ movement? Reflections on the Kermit Gosnell controversy
- Philosophy, critical thinking and ‘after-birth abortion: why should the baby live?’
- After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?