Article info
PDFResponse
Paper
The moral significance of being born
- Correspondence to Dr Neil Levy, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia; neil.levy{at}philosophy.ox.ac.uk
Citation
The moral significance of being born
Publication history
- Received April 17, 2012
- Revised June 8, 2012
- Accepted November 29, 2012
- First published May 1, 2013.
Online issue publication
May 01, 2013
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Of course the baby should live: against ‘after-birth abortion’
- Birth, meaningful viability and abortion
- Infanticide, moral status and moral reasons: the importance of context
- Infanticide: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva
- Abortion, infanticide and moral context
- Parental responsibilities and moral status
- Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva