Article info
Response
Mini-symposium on after-birth abortion
The performativity of personhood
Citation
The performativity of personhood
Publication history
- First published May 1, 2013.
Online issue publication
May 01, 2013
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and ‘after-birth abortion’
- Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva
- Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva
- Pregnancy and superior moral status: a proposal for two thresholds of personhood
- Abortion, infanticide and moral context
- Clinicians’ criteria for fetal moral status: viability and relationality, not sentience
- Of course the baby should live: against ‘after-birth abortion’
- Philosophy, critical thinking and ‘after-birth abortion: why should the baby live?’
- Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth