Article info
Response
Mini-symposium on after-birth abortion
‘After-birth abortion’ and arguments from potential
Citation
‘After-birth abortion’ and arguments from potential
Publication history
- First published May 1, 2013.
Online issue publication
May 01, 2013
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and ‘after-birth abortion’
- Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
- After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?
- Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Infanticide: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva
- Abortion, infanticide and moral context
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Potentials and burdens: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva
- The moral status of babies