Article Text
Response
Mini-symposium on after-birth abortion
‘After-birth abortion’ and arguments from potential
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva reject arguments from claims that fetuses and newborn infants are potential persons, because they argue that potential persons cannot be harmed.1 But whether or not potential persons can be harmed, is it clear that potential persons are entirely lacking in moral status, of a kind that could count as a (pro tanto) reason against bringing about their demise? We do not generally regard potential as entirely lacking in moral value until it is actualised. For example, parents who believe they have identified in their child an emerging musical talent commonly see this potential as having some (not necessarily moral) value, however small, which would count as a reason against destroying that …
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and ‘after-birth abortion’
- Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
- After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?
- Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Infanticide: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva
- Abortion, infanticide and moral context
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Potentials and burdens: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva
- The moral status of babies