Article Text
PDFResponse
Mini-symposium on after-birth abortion
Some comments on the paper ‘After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?’
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Abortion, infanticide and moral context
- The Italian reaction to the Giubilini and Minerva paper
- Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva
- Potentials and burdens: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva
- Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva
- Of course the baby should live: against ‘after-birth abortion’
- Infanticide: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva
- Concern for our vulnerable prenatal and neonatal children: a brief reply to Giubilini and Minerva
- Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility