Article info
PDFResponse
Mini-symposium on after-birth abortion
Introduction
Citation
Introduction
Publication history
- Received October 12, 2012
- Accepted November 29, 2012
- First published May 1, 2013.
Online issue publication
May 01, 2013
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva
- The Italian reaction to the Giubilini and Minerva paper
- In defence of academic freedom: bioethics journals under siege
- Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and ‘after-birth abortion’
- Clarifications on the moral status of newborns and the normative implications
- A bioethics for all seasons
- Potentials and burdens: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva
- After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?