Article Text
PDFResponse
Mini-symposium on after-birth abortion
Introduction
Statistics from Altmetric.com
In light of controversy surrounding the initial online publication of Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva's article on ‘After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?’ in the Journal of Medical Ethics,1 …
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva
- The Italian reaction to the Giubilini and Minerva paper
- In defence of academic freedom: bioethics journals under siege
- Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and ‘after-birth abortion’
- Clarifications on the moral status of newborns and the normative implications
- A bioethics for all seasons
- Potentials and burdens: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva
- After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?