Article Text
Abstract
When writing about policy, do you think in green or white? If not, I recommend that you do. I suggest that writers and journal editors should explicitly label every policy ethics paper either ‘green’ or ‘white’. A green paper is an unconstrained exploration of a policy question. The controversial ‘After-birth abortion’ paper is an example. Had it been labelled as ‘green’, readers could have understood what Giubilini and Minerva explained later: that it was a discussion of philosophical ideas, and not a policy proposal advocating infanticide. A serious policy proposal should be labelled by writer(s) and editor(s) as ‘white’. Its purpose should be to influence policy. In order to influence policy, I suggest three essential, and two desirable, characteristics of any white paper. Most importantly, a white paper should be set in the context in which the policy is to be made and applied.
- Philosophical Ethics
- Policy Guidelines/Inst. Review Boards/Review Cttes.
- Public Policy
- Publication Ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Use of paper selectively absorbing long wavelengths to reduce the impact of educational near work on human refractive development
- Policy addressing suicidality in children and young people: an international scoping review
- Where now for social care in England?
- Abortion, infanticide and moral context
- ETHICS BRIEFINGS
- Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva
- A bioethics for all seasons
- The Italian reaction to the Giubilini and Minerva paper
- Infanticide, moral status and moral reasons: the importance of context
- Policy addressing suicidality in children and young people: a scoping review protocol