Article info
PDFThe argument
Is the pro-choice position for infanticide ‘madness’?
- Correspondence to Professor Charles Camosy, Fordham University, 441 E. Fordham Road, New York, NY 10458, USA; ccamosy{at}gmail.com
Citation
Is the pro-choice position for infanticide ‘madness’?
Publication history
- Received May 22, 2012
- Accepted January 29, 2013
- First published May 1, 2013.
Online issue publication
May 01, 2013
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Infanticide and madness
- The Italian reaction to the Giubilini and Minerva paper
- In defence of academic freedom: bioethics journals under siege
- Response to: Is the pro-choice position for infanticide ‘madness’?
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Cursed lamp: the problem of spontaneous abortion
- Concern for our vulnerable prenatal and neonatal children: a brief reply to Giubilini and Minerva
- The pearl of the ‘Pro-Life’ movement? Reflections on the Kermit Gosnell controversy
- Infanticide, moral status and moral reasons: the importance of context
- Birth, meaningful viability and abortion