In The Netherlands, neonatal euthanasia has become a legal option and the Groningen Protocol contains an approach to identify situations in which neonatal euthanasia might be appropriate. In the 5 years following the publication of the protocol, neither the prediction that this would be the first step on a slippery slope, nor the prediction of complete transparency and legal control became true. Instead, we experienced a transformation of the healthcare system after antenatal screening policy became a part of antenatal care. This resulted in increased terminations of pregnancy and less euthanasia.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
- Neonatal euthanasia: moral considerations and criminal liability
- After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?
- Abortion, infanticide and allowing babies to die, 40 years on
- End-of-life decisions for children under 1 year of age in the Netherlands: decreased frequency of administration of drugs to deliberately hasten death
- The Groningen protocol: another perspective
- End of life decision-making in neonatal care
- Should euthanasia be legal? An international survey of neonatal intensive care units staff
- Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva
- Cultural explanations and clinical ethics: active euthanasia in neonatology