Article Text
The argument
Paper
The Groningen Protocol for newborn euthanasia; which way did the slippery slope tilt?
Abstract
In The Netherlands, neonatal euthanasia has become a legal option and the Groningen Protocol contains an approach to identify situations in which neonatal euthanasia might be appropriate. In the 5 years following the publication of the protocol, neither the prediction that this would be the first step on a slippery slope, nor the prediction of complete transparency and legal control became true. Instead, we experienced a transformation of the healthcare system after antenatal screening policy became a part of antenatal care. This resulted in increased terminations of pregnancy and less euthanasia.
- Neonatology
- Ethics
- Decision-making
- End-of-life
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
- Neonatal euthanasia: moral considerations and criminal liability
- After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?
- Abortion, infanticide and allowing babies to die, 40 years on
- End-of-life decisions for children under 1 year of age in the Netherlands: decreased frequency of administration of drugs to deliberately hasten death
- The Groningen protocol: another perspective
- End of life decision-making in neonatal care
- Should euthanasia be legal? An international survey of neonatal intensive care units staff
- Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva
- Cultural explanations and clinical ethics: active euthanasia in neonatology