Article info
PDFThe argument
Infanticide, moral status and moral reasons: the importance of context
- Correspondence to Dr Leslie Francis, University of Utah, S.J. Quinney College of Law, 332 S. 1400 E., Room 101, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA; francisl{at}law.utah.edu
Citation
Infanticide, moral status and moral reasons: the importance of context
Publication history
- Received June 12, 2012
- Revised October 30, 2012
- Accepted November 30, 2012
- First published May 1, 2013.
Online issue publication
May 01, 2013
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Abortion, infanticide and moral context
- Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and ‘after-birth abortion’
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
- Of course the baby should live: against ‘after-birth abortion’
- Philosophy, critical thinking and ‘after-birth abortion: why should the baby live?’
- Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva
- Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva
- The moral significance of being born
- After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?