Article info
PDFThe argument
Capacity, harm and experience in the life of persons as equals
- Correspondence to Professor John Finnis, University of Oxford, University College, Oxford OX1 4BH, UK; john.finnis{at}univ.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Capacity, harm and experience in the life of persons as equals
Publication history
- Received October 31, 2012
- Accepted November 29, 2012
- First published May 1, 2013.
Online issue publication
May 01, 2013
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?
- Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva
- Why should the baby live? Human right to life and the precautionary principle
- Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva
- Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and ‘after-birth abortion’
- After-birth and before-birth personhood: why the baby should live
- Potentials and burdens: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva
- Infanticide: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva
- Abortion, infanticide and moral context
- Philosophy, critical thinking and ‘after-birth abortion: why should the baby live?’