Article info
PDFEditorial
Discussing infanticide
- Correspondence to Professor Peter Singer, University Center for Human Values, Princeton University, 5 Ivy Lane Princeton, NJ 08544, USA;singerp{at}gmail.com
Citation
Discussing infanticide
Publication history
- Received June 7, 2012
- Accepted July 24, 2012
- First published May 1, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva
- Of course the baby should live: against ‘after-birth abortion’
- Abortion, infanticide and moral context
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and ‘after-birth abortion’
- Infanticide: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva
- Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
- The moral significance of being born
- The pearl of the ‘Pro-Life’ movement? Reflections on the Kermit Gosnell controversy
- Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva