Commentary on ‘Biodefence and the production of knowledge: rethinking the problem’
Buchanan and Kelley provide a sophisticated and thoughtful critique of contemporary discussions of biosecurity. They provide sound critiques of American biodefence institutions, and the general sense of imminent threat underlying the rush to fund biodefence. However, the essay consistently misrepresents the breadth and depth of scholarly research on the ethics and politics of biodefence.
- Chemical and biological weapons
- public health ethics
- allocation of healthcare resources
- behavioural research
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Biodefence and the production of knowledge: rethinking the problem
- Biosecurity and the division of cognitive labour
- Great expectations—ethics, avian flu and the value of progress
- Public awareness, acceptability and risk perception about infectious diseases dual-use research of concern: a cross-sectional survey
- Dual use opportunity and public health infrastructure
- Biodefense and dual-use research: the optimisation problem and the value of security
- Applied genomics for identification of virulent biothreats and for disease outbreak surveillance
- Biological warfare and bioterrorism
- Whose ethics of knowledge? Taking the next step in evaluating knowledge in synthetic biology: a response to Douglas and Savulescu
- Organisational justice and mental health: a systematic review of prospective studies