Article Text
Abstract
In response to public outrage stemming from exposés of animal abuse in research laboratories, the US Congress in 1985 mandated Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUCs) to oversee animal use at institutions receiving federal grants. IACUCs were enjoined to respect public concern about the treatment of animals in research, but they were not specifically instructed whether or not to perform ethical cost-benefit analyses of animal research protocols that IACUCs have chosen, with approval contingent upon a balancing of animal pain and suffering against a reasonable expectation of resultant human benefit. IACUCs have chosen not to make such ethical judgments but, rather, restrict themselves to an advisory role, often tweaking the details of animal-use protocols, but eventually approving all of them. This disinclination by IACUCs to take a broader ethical view of their authority and responsibilities may reflect a membership composition highly skewed towards animal researchers themselves (67%) and institutional veterinarians (15%), both with vested interests in continuing animal research. The resultant ethical monoculture may impair IACUC's ability to meet public concern for laboratory animal welfare. Psychological research has established that unconscious bias affects us all, that deliberations among the like-minded lead to adapting extremist positions, and that groupthink blinds organisations to alternatives that might be obvious to outsiders. Taken together, skewed IACUC membership composition and psychological research insights into unconscious bias and groupthink suggest that an infusion of ethical diversity by increasing the percentage of institutionally unaffiliated members on IACUCs would broaden their ethical perspectives and enable them to better address public concerns about laboratory animal welfare.
- Animal Experimentation
- Ethics Committees/Consultation
- Government/Criminal Justice
- Public Law
- Research Ethics
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Other content recommended for you
- Reforming the politics of animal research
- Diversity and inclusion for rodents: how animal ethics committees can help improve translation
- M1 macrophages are required for murine cerebral aneurysm formation
- Animal researchers shoulder a psychological burden that animal ethics committees ought to address
- Xenotransplantation: a bioethical evaluation
- Whistleblowing in academic medicine
- Augmentation of perfusion with simultaneous vasodilator and inotropic agents in experimental acute middle cerebral artery occlusion: a pilot study
- 953 Treatment with SQ3370, a doxorubicin-based therapeutic, corresponds with immunomodulation of the tumor microenvironment
- 478 A novel antagonist monoclonal antibody against human adenosine receptor 2a (A2aR) for cancer immunotherapies
- 11 Molecular characterization of naturally occurring colorectal and breast cancer in non-human primates to model human immunotherapeutic agents