Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Ives et al claim to have identified a paradox within patient and public involvement (PPI) in research1—that is, that the benefits of PPI can never be fully realised because when a lay person is trained to a level at which they can make a useful contribution to research, they lose their unique ‘lay’ perspective. They conclude that we should not train lay people in research before involvement. Ives et al also conclude that we should not develop a collaborative approach to PPI in conducting research. Both these conclusions are flawed. PPI does not always involve the lay person acquiring the same skills as a researcher, and even when it does, that person never loses their unique ‘lay’ perspective.
PPI is a complex activity that is highly context dependent. There are many different kinds of involvement requiring different kinds of lay expertise. In many cases the lay person does not need to acquire research skills in order to be effective. They can make useful contributions without being ‘turned into a researcher’. The views of the lay person are complementary to those of the technical experts. PPI provides an insight into the interests and concerns of the participants and …
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Patient and public involvement in health research in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review
- Challenges and opportunities for involving patients and the public in acute antimicrobial medicine development research: an interview study
- Role of patient and public involvement in implementation research: a consensus study
- Public and patient involvement in child health research and service improvements: a survey of hospital doctors
- Introducing patient and public involvement practices to healthcare research in Austria: strategies to promote change at multiple levels
- Making patient and public involvement in cancer and palliative research a reality: academic support is vital for success
- Frequency of reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research studies published in a general medical journal: a descriptive study
- Impact of involving people with dementia and their care partners in research: a qualitative study
- PPI, paradoxes and Plato: who's sailing the ship?
- Impact of patient and public involvement on enrolment and retention in clinical trials: systematic review and meta-analysis