Background Decisions regarding Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) orders remain demanding, as does including patients in the process.
Objectives To explore physicians’ justification for CPR/DNAR orders and decisions regarding patient inclusion, as well as their reports of how they initiated discussions with patients.
Methods We administered a face-to-face survey to residents in charge of 206 patients including DNAR and CPR orders, with or without patient inclusion.
Results Justifications were provided for 59% of DNAR orders and included severe comorbidity, patients and families’ resuscitation preferences, patients’ age, or poor prognosis or quality of life. Reasons to include patients in CPR/DNAR decisions were provided in 96% and 84% of cases, and were based on respect for autonomy, clinical assessment of the situation as not too severe, and the view that such inclusion was required. Reasons for not including patients were offered in 84% of cases for CPR and in 70% for DNAR. They included absent decision-making capacity, a clinical situation viewed as good (CPR) or offering little hope of recovery (DNAR), barriers to communication, or concern that discussions could be emotionally difficult or superfluous. Decisions made earlier in the patient's management were infrequently viewed as requiring revision. Residents reported a variety of introductions to discussions with patients.
Conclusions These results provide better understanding of reasons for CPR/DNAR decisions, reasons for patient inclusion or lack thereof, and ways in which such inclusion is initiated. They also point to potential side-effects of implementing CPR/DNAR recommendations without in-depth and practical training. This should be part of a regular audit and follow-up process for such recommendations.
- Clinical Ethics
- Right to Refuse Treatment
- Quality of Health Care
- Living Wills/Advance Directives
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- In what circumstances will a neonatologist decide a patient is not a resuscitation candidate?
- Do-not-attempt-resuscitation (DNAR) orders: understanding and interpretation of their use in the hospitalised patient in Ireland. A brief report
- Ethics briefings
- Advance care planning for adolescent patients with life-threatening neurological conditions: a survey of Japanese paediatric neurologists
- Decisions Relating to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: commentary 1: CPR and the cost of autonomy
- Offering older hospitalised patients the choice to die in their preferred place
- An audit of “do not attempt resuscitation” decisions in two district general hospitals: do current guidelines need changing?
- Guideline for the management of terminal haemorrhage in palliative care patients with advanced cancer discharged home for end-of-life care
- End of life care in the emergency department
- Improving rates of implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation in end-of-life care