Article info
PDFElective ventilation
Paper
Is providing elective ventilation in the best interests of potential donors?
- Correspondence to Dr Andrew John McGee, Faculty of Law, Health Law Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia; a.mcgee{at}qut.edu.au
Citation
Is providing elective ventilation in the best interests of potential donors?
Publication history
- Received July 31, 2012
- Revised November 27, 2012
- Accepted December 14, 2012
- First published January 15, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Why I wrote my advance decision to refuse life-prolonging treatment: and why the law on sanctity of life remains problematic
- Elective ventilation for organ donation: law, policy and public ethics
- Proposal to support making decisions about the organ donation process
- Best interests and potential organ donors
- Ventilating the debate: elective ventilation revisited
- Elective ventilation and the politics of death
- Ethics briefings
- Dignifying death and the morality of elective ventilation
- Elective non-therapeutic intensive care and the four principles of medical ethics
- Withdrawing clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (CANH) in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: is there still a role for the courts?