Article info
PDFEditorial
Ventilating the debate: elective ventilation revisited
- Correspondence to Dr Dominic Wilkinson, Department of Neonatal Medicine, University of Adelaide, 72 King William Rd, North Adelaide, South Australia 5006, Australia; dominic.wilkinson{at}adelaide.edu.au
Citation
Ventilating the debate: elective ventilation revisited
Publication history
- Received January 23, 2013
- Accepted January 23, 2013
- First published February 18, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Elective non-therapeutic intensive care and the four principles of medical ethics
- Elective ventilation for organ donation: law, policy and public ethics
- Dignifying death and the morality of elective ventilation
- Is providing elective ventilation in the best interests of potential donors?
- Elective ventilation and the politics of death
- Is informed consent required for the diagnosis of brain death regardless of consent for organ donation?
- Premortem interventions in dying children to optimise organ donation: an ethical analysis
- Honouring the donor: in death and in life
- Current status of paediatric and neonatal organ donation in the UK
- DONORS (Donation Network to Optimise Organ Recovery Study): Study protocol to evaluate the implementation of an evidence-based checklist for brain-dead potential organ donor management in intensive care units, a cluster randomised trial