Policy work is often cited as one of the primary functions of Hospital Ethics Committees (HECs), along with consultation and education. Hospital policies can have far reaching effects on a wide array of stakeholders including, care providers, patients, families, the culture of the organisation and the community at large. In comparison with the wealth of information available about the emerging practice of ethics consultation, relatively little attention has been paid to the policy work of HECs. In this paper, we hope to advance the development of best practices in HEC policy work by describing the quality improvement process that we undertook at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. In the first section of the paper we describe the context of our HEC policy work, and the shortcomings of our historical review process. In subsequent sections, we detail the quality improvement project we undertook in 2010, the results of the project and the specific tools we developed to enhance the quality of HEC policy work. Our goal in sharing this organisational case study is to prompt other HECs to publish qualitative descriptions of their policy work, in order to generate a body of knowledge that can inform the development of best practices for ethics policy review.
- Ethics Committees/Consultation
- Policy Guidelines/Inst. Review Boards/Review Cttes.
- Quality of Health Care
- Clinical Ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Development of clinical ethics services in the UK: a national survey
- Legal aspects of clinical ethics committees
- Clinical ethics support services in the UK: an investigation of the current provision of ethics support to health professionals in the UK
- Challenging misconceptions about clinical ethics support during COVID-19 and beyond: a legal update and future considerations
- Evaluating a clinical ethics committee (CEC) implementation process in an oncological research hospital: protocol for a process evaluation study using normalisation process theory (EvaCEC)
- What is the role of clinical ethics support in the era of e-medicine?
- Consultation activities of clinical ethics committees in the United Kingdom: an empirical study and wake-up call
- Importance of systematic deliberation and stakeholder presence: a national study of clinical ethics committees
- Ethics support in clinical practice
- The quality of bioethics debate: implications for clinical ethics committees