Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Paper
Spontaneous abortion and unexpected death: a critical discussion of Marquis on abortion
- Correspondence to Dr Mary Clayton Coleman, Department of Philosophy, Illinois Wesleyan University, PO Box 2900, Bloomington, IL 61702, USA; mary.clayton.coleman{at}gmail.com
Citation
Spontaneous abortion and unexpected death: a critical discussion of Marquis on abortion
Publication history
- Received February 27, 2012
- Revised August 27, 2012
- Accepted September 10, 2012
- First published October 4, 2012.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- A critique of “the best secular argument against abortion”
- The Two tragedies argument
- Abortion and Ectogenesis: Moral Compromise
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Reply to Marquis: how things stand with the ‘future like ours’ argument
- A defence of the potential future of value theory
- Deprivations, futures and the wrongness of killing
- Consent and end of life decisions
- A dualist analysis of abortion: personhood and the concept of self qua experiential subject
- Cursed lamp: the problem of spontaneous abortion