Lay REC members: patient or public?
Download to a citation manager
Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:
- Cite this article as:
- Lay REC members: patient or public?
Other content recommended for you
- Standards for research ethics committees: purpose, problems and the possibilities of other approaches
- Problems and development strategies for research ethics committees in China’s higher education institutions
- Results of a self-assessment tool to assess the operational characteristics of research ethics committees in low- and middle-income countries
- Prisoners as research participants: current practice and attitudes in the UK
- Can an ethics officer role reduce delays in research ethics approval? A mixed-method evaluation of an improvement project
- Public and patient involvement in child health research and service improvements: a survey of hospital doctors
- ‘The ethics approval took 20 months on a trial which was meant to help terminally ill cancer patients. In the end we had to send the funding back’: a survey of views on human research ethics reviews
- Frequency of reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research studies published in a general medical journal: a descriptive study
- From plans to actions in patient and public involvement: qualitative study of documented plans and the accounts of researchers and patients sampled from a cohort of clinical trials
- Strengthening ethics committees for health-related research in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review