Article info
PDFNeuroethics
Paper
Authenticity or autonomy? When deep brain stimulation causes a dilemma
- Correspondence to Dr Felicitas Kraemer, Department of Philosophy & Ethics, Eindhoven University of Technology, IPO 1.01, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands; f.kraemer{at}tue.nl
Citation
Authenticity or autonomy? When deep brain stimulation causes a dilemma
Publication history
- Received December 3, 2012
- Revised December 16, 2012
- Accepted January 3, 2013
- First published January 26, 2013.
Online issue publication
November 15, 2013
Article Versions
- Previous version (26 January 2013).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Authenticity and autonomy in deep-brain stimulation
- The burden of normality: from ‘chronically ill’ to ‘symptom free’. New ethical challenges for deep brain stimulation postoperative treatment
- Paediatric deep brain stimulation: ethical considerations in malignant Tourette syndrome
- Deep brain stimulation: a return journey from psychiatry to neurology
- No going back? Reversibility and why it matters for deep brain stimulation
- Long-term functional outcomes improved with deep brain stimulation in patients with disorders of consciousness
- Deep brain stimulation: practical insights and common queries
- Deep brain stimulation activation volumes and their association with neurophysiological mapping and therapeutic outcomes
- Driving restrictions following deep brain stimulation surgery
- Different patterns of medication change after subthalamic or pallidal stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: target related effect or selection bias?