Article Text
Neuroethics
Paper
Authenticity or autonomy? When deep brain stimulation causes a dilemma
Abstract
While deep brain stimulation (DBS) for patients with Parkinson's disease has typically raised ethical questions about autonomy, accountability and personal identity, recent research indicates that we need to begin taking into account issues surrounding the patients’ feelings of authenticity and alienation as well. In order to bring out the relevance of this dimension to ethical considerations of DBS, I analyse a recent case study of a Dutch patient who, as a result of DBS, faced a dilemma between autonomy and authenticity. This case study is meant to point out the normatively meaningful tension patients under DBS experience between authenticity and autonomy.
- Neuroethics
- Deep Brain Stimulation
- Autonomy
- Philosophical Ethics
- Technology/Risk Assessment
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Authenticity and autonomy in deep-brain stimulation
- The burden of normality: from ‘chronically ill’ to ‘symptom free’. New ethical challenges for deep brain stimulation postoperative treatment
- Paediatric deep brain stimulation: ethical considerations in malignant Tourette syndrome
- Deep brain stimulation: a return journey from psychiatry to neurology
- No going back? Reversibility and why it matters for deep brain stimulation
- Long-term functional outcomes improved with deep brain stimulation in patients with disorders of consciousness
- Deep brain stimulation: practical insights and common queries
- Deep brain stimulation activation volumes and their association with neurophysiological mapping and therapeutic outcomes
- Driving restrictions following deep brain stimulation surgery
- Different patterns of medication change after subthalamic or pallidal stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: target related effect or selection bias?