Article Text
Abstract
Evaluation of clinical ethics support services (CESS) has attracted considerable interest in recent decades. However, few evaluation studies are explicit about normative presuppositions which underlie the goals and the research design of CESS evaluation. In this paper, we provide an account of normative premises of different approaches to CESS evaluation and argue that normativity should be a focus of considerations when designing and conducting evaluation research of CESS. In a first step, we present three different approaches to CESS evaluation from published literature. Next to a brief sketch of the well-established approaches of ‘descriptive evaluation’ and ‘evaluation of outcomes’, we will give a more detailed description of a third approach to evaluation—‘reconstructing quality norms of CESS’—which is explicit about the normative presuppositions of its research (design). In the subsequent section, we will analyse the normative premises of each of the three approaches to CESS evaluation. We will conclude with a brief argument for more sensitivity towards the normativity of CESS and its evaluation research.
- Clinical Ethics
- Ethics Committees/Consultation
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Morisprudence: a theoretical framework for studying the relationship linking moral case deliberation, organisational learning and quality improvement
- Important outcomes of moral case deliberation: a Euro-MCD field survey of healthcare professionals’ priorities
- Objectives and outcomes of clinical ethics services: a Delphi study
- Teaching ethics in the clinic. The theory and practice of moral case deliberation
- Moral case deliberation
- Training healthcare professionals as moral case deliberation facilitators: evaluation of a Dutch training programme
- Framework for evaluation research on clinical ethical case interventions: the role of ethics consultants
- Need for ethics support in healthcare institutions: views of Dutch board members and ethics support staff
- Ethics support in institutional elderly care: a review of the literature
- A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance