Aims The aim of this study was to examine if it is plausible to interpret the appearance of shame in a Swedish healthcare setting as a reaction to having one's honour wronged.
Methods Using a questionnaire, we studied answers from a sample of long-term sick-listed patients who had experienced negative encounters (n=1628) and of these 64% also felt wronged. We used feeling wronged to examine emotional reactions such as feeling ashamed and made the assumption that feeling shame could be associated with having one's honour wronged. In statistical analyses relative risks (RRs) were computed, adjusting for age, sex, disease-labelling, educational levels, as well as their 95% CI.
Results Approximately half of those who had been wronged stated that they also felt shame and of those who felt shame, 93% (CI 91 to 95) felt that they had been wronged. The RR was 4.5 (CI 3.0 to 6.8) for shame when wronged. This can be compared with the other emotional reactions where the RRs were between 1.1 (CI 0.9 to 1.3)–1.4 (CI 1.2 to 1.7). We found no association between country of birth and feeling shame after having experienced negative encounters.
Conclusions We found that the RR of feeling shame when wronged was significantly higher compared with other feelings. Along with theoretical considerations, and the specific types of negative encounters associated with shame, the results indicate that our research hypothesis might be plausible. We think that the results deserve to be used as point of departure for future research.
- Moral Psychology
- Public Health Ethics
- Demographic Surveys/Attitudes
- Cultural Pluralism
- Quality of Health Care
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Respectful encounters and return to work: empirical study of long-term sick-listed patients' experiences of Swedish healthcare
- Emotions and encounters with healthcare professionals as predictors for the self-estimated ability to return to work: a cross-sectional study of people with heart failure
- Understanding the use of the National Early Warning Score 2 in acute care settings: a realist review protocol
- Making sense of the evidence in population health intervention research: building a dry stone wall
- Sports injury and illness epidemiology during the 2014 Youth Olympic Games: United States Olympic Team Surveillance
- P38 Making sense of the evidence in population health intervention research: building a dry stone wall
- Staff's perception of abuse in healthcare: a Swedish qualitative study
- Absolute, attributable, and relative risk in the management of coronary heart disease
- End points in clinical trials: are they moving the goalposts?
- Emotionally evocative patients in the emergency department: a mixed methods investigation of providers’ reported emotions and implications for patient safety