Article info
PDFCommentaries
Killing and disabling: a comment on Sinnott-Armstrong and Miller
- Correspondence to Professor Jeff McMahan, Rutgers, Philosophy, 1 Seminary Place, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, USA; jmcmahan{at}princeton.edu
Citation
Killing and disabling: a comment on Sinnott-Armstrong and Miller
Publication history
- Received February 13, 2012
- Accepted March 15, 2012
- First published August 2, 2012.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- A concise argument: on the wrongness of killing
- What makes killing wrong?
- ‘Total disability’ and the wrongness of killing
- Killing versus totally disabling: a reply to critics
- A critique of “the best secular argument against abortion”
- Dependent relational animals
- Reply to Marquis: how things stand with the ‘future like ours’ argument
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Deprivations, futures and the wrongness of killing
- Abortion and human nature