Article info
PDFBrief report
It is the lifetime that matters: public preferences over maximising health and reducing inequalities in health
- Correspondence to Professor Aki Tsuchiya, ScHARR, University of Sheffield, 30 Regent Court, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK; a.tsuchiya{at}sheffield.ac.uk
Citation
It is the lifetime that matters: public preferences over maximising health and reducing inequalities in health
Publication history
- Received September 8, 2011
- Revised February 10, 2012
- Accepted March 3, 2012
- First published April 6, 2012.
Online issue publication
August 23, 2012
Article Versions
- Previous version (6 April 2012).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Justice and the NICE approach
- Incremental benefits of novel pharmaceuticals in the UK: a cross-sectional analysis of NICE technology appraisals from 2010 to 2020
- National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence appraisal and ageism
- NICE’s end of life decision making scheme: impact on population health
- Against proportional shortfall as a priority-setting principle
- Quality-adjusted life years
- Valuing health directly
- How to avoid unfair discrimination against disabled patients in healthcare resource allocation
- National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments
- Should age matter in COVID-19 triage? A deliberative study