Article info
The concise argument
Highlights from this issue
Citation
Highlights from this issue
Publication history
- Accepted August 1, 2012
- First published August 23, 2012.
Online issue publication
August 23, 2012
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Predictive genetic testing in minors for late-onset conditions: a chronological and analytical review of the ethical arguments
- Predictive testing in minors: the need for empirical evidence
- Testing children for adult onset conditions: the importance of contextual clinical judgement
- Resolving the impasse on predictive genetic testing in minors: will more evidence be the solution?
- The impact of proband mediated information dissemination in families with a BRCA1/2 gene mutation
- The complexities of predictive genetic testing
- Commentary on predictive genetic testing of minors: by Mand et al
- Cardiovascular genetics: the role of genetic testing in diagnosis and management of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
- Why philosophy is important to medical ethics
- Predictive genetic testing in children and adults: a study of emotional impact