The contention of this paper is that the current ethical debate over embryonic stem cell research is polarised to an extent that is not warranted by the underlying ethical conflict. It is argued that the ethical debate can be rendered more nuanced, and less polarised, by introducing non-binary notions of moral rightness and wrongness. According to the view proposed, embryonic stem cell research—and possibly other controversial activities too—can be considered ‘a little bit right and a little bit wrong’. If this idea were to become widely accepted, the ethical debate would, for conceptual reasons, become less polarised.
- Stem cell
- degree of rightness
- lottery paradox
- moral dilemma
- stem cell research
- concept of health
- philosophical ethics
- allocation of organs/tissues
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- A qualified endorsement of embryonic stem cell research, based on two widely shared beliefs about the brain-diseased patients such research might benefit
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- Ethics for embryos
- How reproductive and regenerative medicine meet in a Chinese fertility clinic. Interviews with women about the donation of embryos to stem cell research
- The “future like ours” argument and human embryonic stem cell research
- Embryonic stem cells: the disagreement debate and embryonic stem cell research in Israel
- Stem cells, embryos, and the environment: a context for both science and ethics
- NIH Stem Cell Task Force Examines Barriers to Embryonic Stem Cell Research, and Other Stem Cell Research-related News
- Human embryonic stem cell research debates: a Confucian argument
- What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate