Article info
PDFGlobal medical ethics
Paper
Ethical approval in developing countries is not optional
- Correspondence to Professor Edwin Roland van Teijlingen, Bournemouth University, School of Health and Social Care, Royal London House, Christchurch Road, Bournemouth BH1 3LT, UK; evteijlingen{at}bournemouth.ac.uk
Citation
Ethical approval in developing countries is not optional
Publication history
- Received July 13, 2011
- Revised November 4, 2011
- Accepted December 27, 2011
- First published February 16, 2012.
Online issue publication
June 27, 2012
Article Versions
- Previous version (16 February 2012).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Health service research: the square peg in human subjects protection regulations
- Clinical Research From Proposal to Implementation
- How IRBs view and make decisions about coercion and undue influence
- Individual genetic and genomic research results and the tradition of informed consent: exploring US review board guidance
- Analysis of warning letters issued by the US Food and Drug Administration to clinical investigators, institutional review boards and sponsors: a retrospective study
- Ethics committees for biomedical research in some African emerging countries: which establishment for which independence? A comparison with the USA and Canada
- How US institutional review boards decide when researchers need to translate studies
- Variations in institutional review board processes and consent requirements for trauma research: an EAST multicenter survey
- A qualitative study of institutional review board members ’ experience reviewing research proposals using emergency exception from informed consent
- Developing capacity to protect human research subjects in a post-conflict, resource - constrained setting: procedures and prospects