Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Paper
Is there an objective way to compare research risks?
- Correspondence to Dr John Rossi, Community Health and Prevention, Drexel University School of Public Health, 1505 Race Street, Bellet Building, 11th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA; jar444{at}drexel.edu
Citation
Is there an objective way to compare research risks?
Publication history
- Received August 23, 2011
- Revised February 1, 2012
- Accepted February 2, 2012
- First published February 25, 2012.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Eliminating the daily life risks standard from the definition of minimal risk
- Drug development for children: how adequate is the current European ethical guidance?
- Reconsidering ‘minimal risk’ to expand the repertoire of trials with waiver of informed consent for research
- Ethics review of research: in pursuit of proportionality
- Ethical issues of clinical trials in children: a European perspective
- Challenge studies of human volunteers: ethical issues
- Process of risk assessment by research ethics committees: foundations, shortcomings and open questions
- An empirical approach for defining acceptable levels of risk: a case study in team sports
- The harm susceptibility model: a method to prioritise risks identified in patient safety reporting systems
- Benefits and harms associated with hormone replacement therapy: clinical decision analysis