Article Text
Abstract
Heuser and colleagues' survey of obstetricians provides a valuable insight into the current management of severe fetal anomalies in the United States. Their survey reveals two striking features - that counselling for these anomalies is far from neutral, and that there is significant variability between clinicians in their approach to management. In this commentary I outline the reasons to be concerned about both of these. Directiveness in counselling arguably represents a form of paternalism, and the evident variability in practice is likely the result of physician personal values. However, Heuser's survey may, by shining a light on practice, provide an important step towards a more consistent approach.
- Newborns and minors
- withdrawal/withholding treatment
- best interests
- neonatology
- intensive care
- clinical ethics
- allowing minors to die
- donation/procurement of organs/tissues
- prolongation of life and euthanasia
- quality/value of life/personhood
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Linked article 100340.
Funding This work was supported by an early career fellowship from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [1016641].
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Linked Articles
- Reproductive ethics
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Do Not Resuscitate orders and ethical decisions in a neonatal intensive care unit in a Muslim community
- Clinicians’ perspectives of parental decision-making following diagnosis of a severe congenital anomaly: a qualitative study
- Identification of clinically significant, submicroscopic chromosome alterations and UPD in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies using genome-wide 250k SNP array analysis
- Survey of physicians' approach to severe fetal anomalies
- Honouring patient's resuscitation wishes: a multiphased effort to improve identification and documentation
- Physicians’ confidence in discussing do not resuscitate orders with patients and surrogates
- The do-not-resuscitate order: associations with advance directives, physician specialty and documentation of discussion 15 years after the Patient Self-Determination Act
- Possible relationship between general and pregnancy-related anxiety during the first half of pregnancy and the birth process: a prospective cohort study
- Should patient consent be required to write a do not resuscitate order?
- Maternal-fetal transmission and adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnant women infected with Zika virus: prospective cohort study in French Guiana