Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Paper
Cognitive neuroenhancement: false assumptions in the ethical debate
  1. Andreas Heinz1,
  2. Roland Kipke2,
  3. Hannah Heimann1,
  4. Urban Wiesing3
  1. 1Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  2. 2University of Tübingen, International Centre for Ethics in the Sciences and Humanities (IZEW), Tübingen, Germany
  3. 3University of Tübingen, Institut für Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin, Tübingen, Germany
  1. Correspondence to Dr Roland Kipke, University of Tübingen, International Centre for Ethics in the Sciences and Humanities (IZEW), Wilhelmstrasse 19, Tübingen 72074, Germany; kipke{at}izew.uni-tuebingen.de

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.