There has been a move in medicine towards patient-centred care, leading to more demands from patients for particular therapies and treatments, and for wish-fulfilling medicine: the use of medical services according to the patient's wishes to enhance their subjective functioning, appearance or health. In contrast to conventional medicine, this use of medical services is not needed from a medical point of view. Boundaries in wish-fulfilling medicine are partly set by a physician's decision to fulfil or decline a patient's wish in practice. In order to develop a better understanding of how wish-fulfilling medicine occurs in practice in The Netherlands, a qualitative study (15 semistructured interviews and 1 focus group) was undertaken. The aim was to investigate the range and kind of arguments used by general practitioners and plastic surgeons in wish-fulfilling medicine. These groups represent the public funded realm of medicine as well as privately paid for services. Moreover, GPs and plastic surgeons can both be approached directly by patients in The Netherlands. The physicians studied raised many arguments that were expected: they used patient autonomy, risks and benefits, normality and justice to limit wish-fulfilling medicine. In addition, arguments new to this debate were uncovered, which were frequently used to justify compliance with a patient's request. Such arguments seem familiar from conventional medicine, including empathy, the patient–doctor relationship and reassurance. Moreover, certain arguments that play a significant role in the literature on wish-fulfilling medicine and enhancement were not mentioned, such as concepts of disease and the enhancement–treatment dichotomy and ‘suspect norms’.
- Biomedical enhancement
- medical ethics
- plastic surgery
- general practitioners
- qualitative research
- clinical ethics
- concept of health
- general medicine/internal medicine
- informed consent
- quality of life
- good life
- geriatric care
- patient autonomy
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding ZonMw (The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development), grant number 141010006.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval This is not necessary under Dutch law for interview studies with competent adult physicians.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Regional differences in the patient population of general practices in northern Germany: results of a mixed-methods study
- Patient-centred care delivered by general practitioners: a qualitative investigation of the experiences and perceptions of patients and providers
- Educational strategies to enhance EBM teaching and learning in the workplace: a focus group study
- Regional variation of patient behaviour and reasons for consultation in the general practice of Northern Germany: protocol for an observational study
- Value promotion as a goal of medicine
- General practice physicians’ and nurses’ self-reported multidisciplinary end-of-life care: a systematic review
- General practice palliative care: patient and carer expectations, advance care plans and place of death—a systematic review
- Identifying threshold concepts in postgraduate general practice training: a focus group, qualitative study
- Impact of digital interdisciplinary consultation on secondary care referrals by general practitioners: a protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial
- Experiences, attitudes and possibilities for improvement concerning the cooperation between occupational physicians, rehabilitation physicians and general practitioners in Germany from the perspectives of the medical groups and rehabilitation patients – a protocol for a qualitative study