Intervening in clinical research to prevent the onset of psychoses: conflicts and obligations
Share this article
Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.
Email this article to a friend
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Early interventions to prevent psychosis: systematic review and meta-analysis
- Can we identify and treat “schizophrenia light” to prevent true psychotic illness?
- Ultra-high-risk paradigm: lessons learnt and new directions
- Limits to research risks
- Cognitive–behavioural therapy can prevent transition to psychosis in ultra-high-risk participants in the long term
- Understanding the course of cognitive deficits over the onset of psychosis
- The EPOS prediction model improves ability to predict transition to first episode psychosis in individuals at high risk
- Paradigm shift? Purity, progress and the origins of first-episode psychosis
- Study protocol for a prospective cohort study examining the predictive potential of dynamic symptom networks for the onset and progression of psychosis: the Mapping Individual Routes of Risk and Resilience (Mirorr) study
- Examining the relationship between neighbourhood deprivation and mental health service use of immigrants in Ontario, Canada: a cross-sectional study