Article Text
Abstract
So-called ‘anonymous’ tissue samples are widely used in research. Because they lack externally identifying information, they are viewed as useful in reconciling conflicts between the control, privacy and confidentiality interests of those from whom the samples originated and the public (or commercial) interest in carrying out research, as reflected in ‘consent or anonymise’ policies. High level guidance documents suggest that withdrawal of consent and samples and the provision of feedback are impossible in the case of anonymous samples. In view of recent developments in science and consumer-driven genomics the authors argue that such statements are misleading and only muddle complex ethical questions about possible entitlements to control over samples. The authors therefore propose that terms such as ‘anonymised’, ‘anonymous’ or ‘non-identifiable’ be removed entirely from documents describing research samples, especially from those aimed at the public. This is necessary as a matter of conceptual clarity and because failure to do so may jeopardise public trust in the governance of large scale databases. As there is wide variation in the taxonomy for tissue samples and no uniform national or international standards, the authors propose that a numeral-based universal coding system be implemented that focuses on specifying incremental levels of identifiability, rather than use terms that imply that the reidentification of research samples and associated actions are categorically impossible.
- Genetic databases
- genetic privacy
- personal genetic information
- genetic testing
- genome-wide association study
- genetics
- law
- ethics committees/consultation
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Advancing independent adolescent consent for participation in HIV prevention research
- PILOT STUDY TO SHORTEN THE REVIEW CYCLE FOR NEW INVESTIGATOR R01 APPLICATIONS (NOT - OD-06-013)
- NEWS
- The case of biobank with the law: between a legal and scientific fiction
- Good and not so good medical ethics
- StudySearch: a web - based application for posting and searching clinical research studies
- Ethics of genetic testing and research in sport: a position statement from the Australian Institute of Sport
- Collection, storage and use of blood samples for future research: views of Egyptian patients expressed in a cross-sectional survey
- New European guidelines for the use of stored human biological materials in biomedical research
- Broadening consent — and diluting ethics