Do all clinical research publications show strong application of ethics principles and respect for biomedical law? We examined, for the year 2009, the ethics requirements displayed on the website of 30 leading medical journals with an impact factor (IF) >10, and 30 others with an IF <10. We carried out a short study looking at the relationship between the IF of a journal and the ethics requirements in its instructions to authors. We show that the IF of a biomedical journal bears a direct relationship to its ethics requirements. Such results should improve the ethics requirements of all biomedical journals, especially those with low IF, so that they are internationally standardised to the higher standard required by journals with higher IF.
- Biomedical research
- biomedical law
- publication rules
- ethical principles
- definition/determination of death
- demographic surveys/attitudes
- ethics committees/consultation
- forensic medicine
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
As the subject is non-clinical, no signed consent to publication was needed. All authors, external and internal, had full access to all of the data (including statistical reports and tables) in the study and can take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- A comparison of journal instructions regarding institutional review board approval and conflict-of-interest disclosure between 1995 and 2005
- Ethics in systematic reviews
- Improving biomedical journals’ ethical policies: the case of research misconduct
- A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
- Conflict of interest policies and disclosure requirements among European Society of Cardiology national cardiovascular journals
- Awareness, usage and perceptions of authorship guidelines: an international survey of biomedical authors
- Do urology journals enforce trial registration? A cross-sectional study of published trials
- Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey
- Problems and development strategies for research ethics committees in China’s higher education institutions
- Plagiarism in research: a survey of African medical journals