Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Paper
Retractions in the medical literature: how can patients be protected from risk?
- Correspondence to Dr R Grant Steen, MediCC! Medical Communications Consultants, LLC, 103 Van Doren Place, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27517, USA; g_steen_medicc{at}yahoo.com
Citation
Retractions in the medical literature: how can patients be protected from risk?
Publication history
- Received August 17, 2011
- Revised October 18, 2011
- Accepted October 23, 2011
- First published December 2, 2011.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Retractions in the medical literature: how many patients are put at risk by flawed research?
- Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
- Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
- Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings
- Empirical developments in retraction
- Retracted papers originating from paper mills: cross sectional study
- Concerns over use of hydroxyethyl starch solutions
- Reasons for and time to retraction of genetics articles published between 1970 and 2018
- Data too important to share: do those who control the data control the message?
- Should research fraud be a crime?