This commentary briefly argues that the four prima facie principles of beneficence, non-maleficence, respect for autonomy and justice enable a clinician (and anybody else) to make ethical sense of the author's proposed reliance on professional guidance and rules, on law, on professional integrity and on best interests, and to subject them all to ethical analysis and criticism based on widely acceptable basic prima facie moral obligations; and also to confront new situations in the light of those acceptable principles.
- Medical ethics
- suicide/assisted suicide
- right to refuse treatment
- resource allocation
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
linked article 100136.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Defending the four principles approach as a good basis for good medical practice and therefore for good medical ethics
- Ethics needs principles—four can encompass the rest—and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals”
- In defence of moral imperialism: four equal and universal prima facie principles
- The bioethical principles and Confucius’ moral philosophy
- Dr Daly's principlist defence of multiple heart valve replacements for continuing opiate users: the importance of Aristotle’s formal principle of justice
- Ethics in epidemiology and public health I. Technical terms
- What principlism misses
- Principlism and moral dilemmas: a new principle
- Sweetening the scent: commentary on “What principlism misses”
- Medical ethics for children: applying the four principles to paediatrics