Medical ethical analysis remains dominated by the principlist account first proposed by Beauchamp and Childress. This paper argues that the principlist model is unreflective of how ethical decisions are taken in clinical practice. Two kinds of medical ethical decisions are distinguished: biosocial ethics and clinical ethics. It is argued that principlism is an inappropriate model for clinical ethics as it is neither sufficiently action-guiding nor does it emphasise the professional integrity of the clinician. An alternative model is proposed for decision making in the realm of clinical ethics.
- Medical ethics
- clinical ethics
- principle-based ethics
- applied and professional ethics
- codes of/position statements on professional ethics
- philosophical ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding This work received no specific funding, but an earlier draft was awarded two prizes by the Institute of Medical Ethics.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- Clinical ethics
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- When four principles are too many: a commentary
- Ethical framework for adult social care in COVID-19
- A new prescription for empirical ethics research in pharmacy: a critical review of the literature
- Fidelity to the healing relationship: a medical student's challenge to contemporary bioethics and prescription for medical practice
- Ethical climate in contemporary paediatric intensive care
- Sources of bias in clinical ethics case deliberation
- Principlism or narrative ethics: must we choose between them?
- Informed consent in neurosurgery—translating ethical theory into action
- Why not common morality?
- Is UNESCO’s Undergraduate Bioethics Integrated Curriculum (Medical) fit for purpose?