Article info
PDFJustice
Paper
How to avoid unfair discrimination against disabled patients in healthcare resource allocation
- Correspondence to Sean Sinclair, ARL Health, 48 Echline Drive, South Queensferry, Edinburgh EH30 9UY, UK; sean.sinclair{at}arl-health.com
Citation
How to avoid unfair discrimination against disabled patients in healthcare resource allocation
Publication history
- Received July 8, 2011
- Revised August 15, 2011
- Accepted September 1, 2011
- First published December 3, 2011.
Online issue publication
February 17, 2012
Article Versions
- Previous version (3 December 2011).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Nice and not so nice
- Against proportional shortfall as a priority-setting principle
- Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in emergency patients with multivessel disease or unobstructed coronary arteries: a cost-effectiveness analysis in the UK
- Delivering the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cost effectiveness analysis
- Incremental benefits of novel pharmaceuticals in the UK: a cross-sectional analysis of NICE technology appraisals from 2010 to 2020
- Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion versus open radical cystectomy (iROC): protocol for a randomised controlled trial with internal feasibility study
- Analysing health outcomes
- NICE is dead; long live NICE
- Not a NICE fallacy: a reply to Dr Quigley
- NICE is not cost effective